Dunne down about Irish slump - Football
Published: 17 Jun 2012 - 12:18:07
Richard Dunne has admitted his heartache at the Republic of Ireland's early Euro 2012 exit.
Dunne and his team-mates arrived in Poland believing they had a genuine chance of at least reaching the quarter-finals, but successive defeats by Croatia and Spain have rendered their final Group C fixture against Italy largely irrelevant, for them at least.
The 32-year-old Aston Villa defender offered a frank assessment of Ireland's performances to date, which have seen them lose 3-1 to the Croatians and 4-0 to the Spaniards. He said: "It's heartbreaking. It's your dream to go and play in the championships and play well and be brilliant, and it's just not happened for us, so it's heartbreaking."
Dunne added: "As much as we wanted to do well, we know we haven't. We are playing against teams that are better than us and it's hard to accept that our best at the moment isn't good enough."
Manager Giovanni Trapattoni has known for the four years he has been in charge that the Republic lack the superstars some of their opponents can boast, but has always been confident that the fighting spirit, pride and organisation of his players would bridge the gap.
However, a 14-game unbeaten run came to a sorry end against Croatia, and the mauling they received at the hands of Spain simply exposed the wounds once again. Worryingly, they conceded in the opening few minutes of each half in both games as the resilience on which they have based their recent run deserted them just when they needed it most.
Dunne said: "It might have been a different tournament if we got through the first 10 minutes in both games. That's the one regret - if we could have got through them, we might have seen a different game, we might have grown a little bit. We have just not had the chance.
"We did everything we possibly could. You have to hold your hands up. Our normal game is pressure, pressure, pressure and...the teams are too good."
Trapattoni's men could be forgiven for wishing they could head straight back to Dublin and avoid what could be another tough 90 minutes if they do not rediscover their form quickly. Italy must win and hope the Spain v Croatia result goes in their favour if they are to avoid an early trip home, and that will make for another intense affair.
However, Dunne said: "We don't want to go home because we don't want to go home feeling like we are. If we win on Monday night, it restores a bit of pride, not just in Irish football, but in ourselves."
Related Republic of Ireland News
Big investors on sidelines in Facebook case: Frankel - Reuters
NEW YORK |
NEW YORK (Reuters) - On Friday, Facebook Inc and its underwriters offered some clues about how they intend to defend the more than 40 suits filed so far in state and federal court that accuse them of deceiving investors in their initial public offering.
From a brief asking the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation to consolidate the Facebook IPO securities litigation in federal court in Manhattan, we learned, first off, who's going to be collecting defense fees for years to come in this case. Facebook has Willkie Farr & Gallagher and Kirkland & Ellis. (Facebook's general counsel is an former Kirkland partner, and Kirkland has close ties to Facebook lead underwriter Morgan Stanley.) Morgan Stanley and Goldman Sachs are represented by Davis Polk & Wardwell.
The brief was unusually feisty for a consolidation request, which is usually a matter of procedural housekeeping. The complaints filed so far against Facebook and the underwriters center on whether the offering materials adequately disclosed Facebook's declining advertising revenue prospects, given that Facebook's oral communications with some analysts (and the analysts' subsequent conversations with favored investors) seemed to be gloomier than the prospectus.
Facebook and the underwriters contend in Friday's brief that the offering materials were just fine and there was nothing wrong with after-the-fact analyst buzz. "Plaintiffs rely heavily on post-IPO articles as sources for their allegations but they ignore that what Facebook and the underwriter defendants allegedly did both followed customary practices and did not violate any rules," the brief said. The Securities and Exchange Commission specifically exempts oral conversations from disclosure requirements, Facebook and the underwriters said, and besides, media reports before the IPO disclosed Facebook's lowered projections.
The brief also suggests that Facebook and the underwriters (like many investors) will blame Nasdaq trading errors for the deflation in Facebook's share price. It wasn't the revelation of undisclosed bad news that sent the stock tumbling, the brief implies, but rather a Nasdaq-created backlog that prompted "a rash of stock sales that ... drove down the price of Facebook shares."
What we don't yet know, of course, is who will lead the securities class action for the plaintiffs. (I'm talking only about the federal-court claims against Facebook and the underwriters under the Securities Act of 1933, not investor cases against Nasdaq or derivative suits against Facebook's board.) I've previously explained why the Facebook IPO cases are such a magnet for plaintiffs' lawyers: There's strict liability for material misstatements in offering documents under sections 11 and 12 of the Securities Act, so there's no need for shareholders to show fraudulent intent. There's also the potential for eye-popping damages, since investors who bought directly from underwriters are entitled to demand that the shares be repurchased at the offering price.
A virtual directory of the securities class action bar -- with some notable exceptions I'll talk about below -- has already appeared in the Facebook IPO litigation. I'm not going to name every firm that's filed a case, but here are some with previous big-case lead counsel experience: Robbins Geller Rudman & Dowd; Milberg; Berger & Montague; Abbey Spanier Rodd & Abrams; Kessler Topaz Meltzer & Check; Schiffrin & Barroway; Pomerantz Haudek Block Grossman & Gross; Kaplan Fox & Kilsheimer; Berman DeValerio; Susman Godfrey; and Hausfeld have all signed complaints filed in Manhattan federal court, most of which have been transferred to U.S. District Judge Robert Sweet. Girard Gibbs & De Bartolomeo; Wolf Haldenstein Adler Freeman & Herz; and Hagens Berman Sobol Shapiro have filed in San Francisco federal court, where U.S. District Judge Maxine Chesney is overseeing the litigation.
That's an impressive list, but so far the potential lead plaintiffs aren't so formidable. All of the federal-court suits on file against Facebook and the underwriters are on behalf of small investors. Facebook sold more than 421 million shares when it went public on May 18; if you tally up the purchases by the two dozen plaintiffs who've filed 1933 Act suits, the total comes to fewer than 20,000 shares, and no investor who's filed a suit bought more than 4,000 shares. Those aren't the kinds of holdings that typically lead to lead plaintiff appointments in megabillion-dollar cases.
But there's still about a month to go before the statutory cutoff for lead plaintiff bids. My guess is that institutional investors that lost big in the Facebook IPO are still talking to plaintiffs' lawyers at firms like Bernstein Litowitz Berger & Grossmann; Grant & Eisenhofer; Labaton Sucharow; and Cohen Milstein Sellers & Toll -- those notable absentees I mentioned above -- about jumping into the case. In another hot securities class action, the case against JPMorgan for allegedly deceiving investors about the London whale, Labaton filed the first complaint for a big pension fund just this week, a month after the first suit was filed. (Incidentally, I'd previously speculated about who would be representing JPMorgan Chase & Co; the class action docket indicates Sullivan & Cromwell has received that particular plum.)
It's still early, in other words, in both the Facebook and JPMorgan cases, with cutoffs for lead plaintiff filings not coming until next month. I'm looking forward to some fierce lead counsel battles.
(Alison Frankel writes the On the Cases blog for Thomson Reuters News & Insight newsandinsight.com. The views expressed are her own.)
(Reporting by Alison Frankel; Editing by Eddie Evans)
Saudi king to bury Crown Prince, find successor - Reuters
RIYADH |
RIYADH (Reuters) - Saudi Arabia's King Abdullah prepared to bury his former heir, Crown Prince Nayef, on Sunday before naming a new successor at a challenging time for the world's top oil exporter and self-styled steward of Islam.
The crown prince's body arrived in Jeddah on Sunday a day after his death, where it was met at King Khaled Airport by a host of Saudi princes.
Among them was the most likely candidate to take the position to succeed the 89-year-old king is Prince Salman, 76, another son of Saudi Arabia's founder Abdulaziz ibn Saud.
The new crown prince will become heir to a king who is aged 89 at a time when Saudi Arabia faces a variety of challenges at home and abroad.
Although the Interior Ministry, which the late Nayef headed for 37 years, crushed al Qaeda inside Saudi Arabia its Yemeni wing has sworn to topple the ruling al-Saud family and has plotted attacks against the kingdom.
Saudi rulers are also grappling with unrest in areas populated by the Shi'ite Muslim minority and with entrenched youth unemployment.
The kingdom is also locked in a region-wide rivalry with Shi'ite Iran - the party at the airport included former Lebanese prime minister Saad al-Hariri, representing the Sunni Muslim political alliance that Saudi Arabia cultivates against Iran.
"We call on God to help King Abdullah choose the right person who can bear the burdens of this position at this difficult time we face both at the level of the Arab nation and that of the Islamic community," Prince Mishaal bin Abdullah bin Turki al-Saud told Reuters.
Salman, who is seen as a pragmatist with a strong grasp of the intricate balance of competing princely and clerical interests that dominate Saudi politics, was named defense minister last year.
The appointment of a new crown prince is not likely to change the kingdom's position on foreign or domestic policy but might influence the course of cautious social and economic reforms started under King Abdullah.
"Certainly they are going to continue to focus on the relationship with the U.S., and continue to make efforts to properly husband their abundant natural resources of oil," said Robert Jordan, U.S. ambassador to Riyadh from 2001 to 2003.
FAMILY COUNCIL
Although most analysts believe it is highly likely Salman will be chosen, the ultimate decision may rest with a family Allegiance Council called to approve King Abdullah's decision.
The Saudi succession does not pass from father to eldest son but has moved along a line of brothers born to Ibn Saud. A previous crown prince, Sultan, died last October.
Under rules drawn up by King Abdullah, the Allegiance Council has 30 days to approve the monarch's successor.
"There will be a meeting where the next crown prince will be decided. It has always been done in an orderly and organized manner. Prince Salman fits the profile in many ways," said Khaled Almaeena, editor-in-chief of the Saudi Gazette.
A source close to the royal family said Nayef had died suddenly in Geneva after receiving treatment for a knee complaint. He was thought to be 78.
Before the funeral, King Abdullah travelled to Mecca on Sunday evening from Jeddah, where the royal court and cabinet spend the summer, Saudi Press Agency reported.
Television showed a host of princes in red-and-white headdresses, including Salman and Mecca governor Prince Khaled al-Faisal gathered on the runway to escort Nayef's body to an ambulance.
Newspapers on Sunday mourned the death on their front pages.
Al-Jazirah's front page was entirely in black and white and showed photographs of the king and late crown prince. The English-language Saudi Gazette splashed a full-page picture of Nayef with the headline: "Unto God do we belong and, verily, unto Him we shall return".
Analysts say the most difficult decision in the succession will be when the line of Ibn Saud's sons is exhausted and a grandson must be chosen as crown prince.
Grandsons with the experience and qualifications to rule include Prince Khaled al-Faisal, the governor of Mecca province who is 71, and Prince Mohammed bin Nayef, the deputy interior minister, who is 52.
"The house of Saud will need to think about what would happen in the event the king became unwell, and there is no way on earth you would hand the crown prince role to a grandson in 48 hours time. You have to find an older prince," said Michael Stephens of the Royal United Services Institute in Qatar.
Only a few princes of the older generation have the experience deemed necessary to rule the Middle East's largest economy.
One of them, Prince Ahmed, is a full brother of Nayef and Salman, as well as the late King Fahd and the former crown prince, Sultan. He has been deputy interior minister since 1975 and is seen as likely to replace Nayef as full minister.
"The expectation is that Prince Ahmed bin Abdulaziz will take over the position of the interior minister after Prince Nayef passed away considering that Prince Ahmed has served as deputy interior minister for 20 years. I think he is the closest to take over this position," Prince Sultan bin Saud al-Saud told Reuters. (Reporting by Angus McDowall; Additional reporting by Ismail Nofal in Jeddah and Isabel Coles in Dubai; Editing by Angus MacSwan)
UK to order reactor for nuclear-armed submarine - source - Reuters UK
LONDON |
LONDON (Reuters) - Britain will order the first reactor for a new generation of nuclear-armed submarines next week as part of a 1 billion pound ($1.6 billion) contract with Rolls-Royce, a defence ministry source said on Sunday, in a move that could strain the coalition government.
The deal, including an 11-year refit of Britain's sole submarine propulsion reactor factory at Derby in central England, would protect 300 Rolls-Royce jobs and many others at suppliers elsewhere, the source said. It is expected to be announced by Defence Secretary Philip Hammond on Monday.
The two-party coalition government is split over plans to replace, at an estimated cost of 25 billion pounds, Britain's four nuclear Vanguard submarines when they retire from service in the 2020s.
Prime Minister David Cameron's Conservative Party wants a new fleet of submarines that will continue to carry the Vanguard's Trident missiles and maintain Britain's independent nuclear capability.
Their smaller Liberal Democrat partners are pushing for cheaper and less destructive alternatives, arguing that the current capability - the ability to obliterate Moscow - is an outdated hangover from the Cold War.
The two parties have postponed a final decision till 2016, after the next parliamentary elections, while agreeing in the meantime to fund the advance work needed to allow the submarines to be built on schedule should they be commissioned.
The Lib Dems insist that the advance contracts do not represent a commitment to a like-for-like renewal, but some analysts say it is unlikely that cash-strapped Britain would outlay huge sums on design and equipment it would later ditch.
The government said last year it expected to spend 3 billion pounds by 2015 on preparatory work for the new submarine fleet.
The deal to be announced on Monday also includes a contract to build the reactor for the last of seven Astute class nuclear-powered attack submarines Britain has on order.
The nuclear propulsion plant for the Vanguard successor will be the more advanced Pressurised Water Reactor 3 (PWR3) system, the government said last year.
Last month Hammond announced 350 million pounds of contracts, mainly with defence contractor BAE Systems, to design the Vanguard successor submarines.
(Editing by Alessandra Rizzo)
Egypt tenses for new president after vote - Reuters India
CAIRO |
CAIRO (Reuters) - Egyptians choosing their president freely for the first time faced a daunting choice between a former general from the old guard and an Islamist who says he is running for God, leaving many voters perplexed and fearful of the future.
A win for either Ahmed Shafik - the last prime minister of ousted autocrat Hosni Mubarak - or Mohamed Morsy, a U.S.-educated engineer who would turn Egypt into an Islamic democracy, will go far to define the outcome of the wave of Arab Spring uprisings last year.
"We have to vote because these elections are historic," said Amr Omar, voting in Cairo, who said he was a revolutionary youth activist. "I will vote for Morsy... Even if it means electing the hypocritical Islamists, we must break the vicious cycle of Mubarak's police state."
Turnout at polling stations in several areas seemed lower on Saturday than during the first round. Polls re-opened at 8 a.m. on Sunday (0600 GMT) and were due to close at 9 p.m.
With no opinion polls, it was impossible to forecast who will emerge the winner by Monday - and whoever it is may face anger and accusations of foul play. Both men have wide support but many voters may be staying away, unhappy at a choice of extremes after centrist candidates were knocked out in a first round last month.
A sample of voter comments to Reuters near polling stations suggest many had put aside doubts about Shafik, whose campaign has gained momentum since he entered the race as an outsider.
A court dissolved Egypt's new parliament late last week, enraging Islamists who hold a sweeping majority in the assembly, who decried a coup by the military rulers who pushed their brother officer Mubarak from power 16 months ago to appease the street protests.
A win for Shafik, 70, who says he has learned the lessons of the revolt and offers security, prosperity and religious tolerance, may prompt claims of Mubarak-style vote-rigging and street protests by the Islamists and some disillusioned youths who made Cairo's Tahrir Square their battleground last year.
Both candidates promise to honour the spirit of last year's mass revolt against rampant corruption, poverty and a hated police force, yet many Egyptians who voted for neither in the first round see a stale contest that smothers hopes for change.
"Egypt writes the closing chapter of the Arab Spring," read a headline on Sunday in independent newspaper al-Watan, which said the election offers a "choice between a military man who aborted the revolution and a Muslim Brother who wasted it."
UNEVEN OUTCOMES
Morsy's campaign suffered a blow when he failed to rally much support from candidates who lost in the first round. To sceptics of the Brotherhood, it confirmed that the Islamist movement was too zealous and inflexible to represent all Egyptians.
"I will vote Shafik because I don't want anybody to impose on me a model of life that I don't accept," said health ministry employee Marianne Mallak, 29, voting in Alexandria. "I don't want somebody to rule the country in the name of religion."
Should Morsy prevail, benefiting from a movement forged by decades of clandestine struggle and from support among those who put aside qualms about Islamic rule to block a return of the old regime, he may be frustrated by an uncooperative military elite, for all the generals' pledges to cede power by July 1.
The Brotherhood on Saturday again denounced the dissolution of parliament, based on a ruling by the Mubarak-era constitutional court, as "a coup against the whole democratic process" and insisted only a popular referendum could reverse the parliamentary election.
But though overturning that vote drew comparison with events that triggered the bloody Algerian civil war 20 years ago, the Brotherhood, which hung back in the early days of the 2011 revolution, has shown little appetite for a violent showdown with Egypt's U.S.-equipped army, the biggest in the Arab world.
That stalemate, coupled with a failure this year of legislators to form a consensus body to draft a new constitution and a consequent lack of clarity over the powers the new head of state will have, leaves Egyptians, Western allies and investors perplexed by the prospect of yet more of the uncertainty that has ravaged the economy and seen sporadic flare-ups in violence.
A gunfight killed two in Cairo overnight and 15 were injured, after a dispute between street vendors, a security source said. There was no apparent connection to the vote, which saw little trouble on Saturday despite mutual accusations of fraud. Observers reported only minor and scattered breaches.
Police arrested 22 foreigners who were planning attacks after the election, another security source said. The Syrians, Jordanians and Palestinians were detained in Cairo on Saturday carrying "sophisticated weapons", the source added, without giving more details.
Should Shafik win, his supporters reckon, he and the ruling military council which took sovereign powers when Mubarak quit would work in harmony to restore confidence, notably for the vital and ravaged tourist trade - but questions would remain over how far the Islamists and other opponents would resist.
"DEEP STATE"
In 60 years since army officers toppled the colonial-era monarchy, Egypt's armed forces have built up massive wealth and commercial interests across industries, helped since the 1970s by a close U.S. alliance which followed the decision of the most populous Arab state to make peace with Israel.
Commonly referred to as the "deep state", it is these shadowy structures, currently overseen in public by the ad hoc Supreme Council of the Armed Forces under Field Marshal Hussein Tantawi, which many Egyptians see maintaining influence long after the promised handover to an elected civilian by July 1.
"There is no doubt that the state in all its institutions - judicial, military, interior, foreign and financial - back Shafik for president and are working to that end," said Hassan Nafaa, a politics professor who campaigned against Mubarak.
"It is very difficult to eradicate this spirit of Mubarak."
Only if liberals swallowed their qualms and voted for Morsy to prevent Shafik winning, Nafaa said, "only then may the 'deep state' back down - but I doubt this will happen."
Washington, paymaster of the Egyptian military, and the European Union, a major aid donor, both expressed alarm at the move against parliament and urged the generals to honour their pledge to stand aside. But, like neighbouring Israel, both are also uneasy at the rise of the Brotherhood and have looked on anxiously as Islamists have closed in on power in other new democracies of the Arab Spring, notably in Tunisia and Libya.
(Reporting by Edmund Blair, Yasmine Saleh, Dina Zayed, Tom Perry, Tamim Elyan; Writing by Alastair Macdonald and Tom Pfeiffer; Editing by Samia Nakhoul)
Greeks head to polls in crucial vote - CBC
Greece voted Sunday amid global fears that victory by parties that have vowed to cancel the country's international bailout agreements and accompanying austerity measures could undermine the European Union's joint currency and pitch the world's major economies into another sharp downturn.
For Greeks, it is the second national election in six weeks and arguably the most critical in decades, reflecting political turmoil sparked by a two-year financial crisis that some fear could force the country to abandon the euro and return to its old currency, the drachma. That in turn would likely drag down other financially troubled countries and threaten the euro itself.
The last opinion polls published before a two-week pre-election ban showed the radical left Syriza party of Alexis Tsipras running neck-and-neck with the conservative New Democracy party of Antonis Samaras. But no party is likely to win enough votes to form a government on its own, meaning a coalition will have to be formed to avoid yet another election.
The results of exit surveys were expected at the close of polling stations at 7 p.m. (1600 GMT) Sunday, and the first official projections were expected at around 9:30 p.m. (1830 GMT). Strong winds in the Greek archipelago forced the cancellation of some ferry routes, raising doubts about whether some voters would be able to get to islands with polling stations in time.
Inconclusive elections on May 6 resulted in no party winning enough votes to form a government, and coalition talks collapsed after 10 days. The vote, which also sent the formerly governing socialist PASOK party plunging to historic lows, sent a very clear message that Greeks have lost patience with the deep austerity imposed in return for the country receiving billions of euros (dollars) in rescue loans from other eurozone countries and the International Monetary Fund.
"I'd like to see something change for the country in general, including regarding the bailout," said Vassilis Stergiou, an early-morning voter at an Athens polling station. "But at least for us to get organized and at the very least do something."
Bailout agreements
Tsipras, a 37-year-old former student activist, has vowed to rip up Greece's bailout agreements and repeal the austerity measures, which have included deep spending cuts on everything from health care to education and infrastructure, as well as tax hikes and reductions of salaries and pensions.
But his pledges, which include canceling planned privatizations, nationalizing banks and rolling back cuts to minimum wages and pensions, have horrified European leaders, as well as many Greeks. Tsipras' opponents argue that the inexperienced young politician is out of touch with reality, and that his policies will force the country out of the euro and lead to poverty for years to come.
Virtually unknown outside of Greece four months ago, Tsipras' pledges and his party's strong showing in the May 6 elections, where he came a surprise second place and quadrupled his support since the 2009 election, has put him in the international spotlight.
Scores of journalists and television news crews from across the world jostled for space to cover Tsipras casting his ballot in an Athens polling center.
"We have beaten fear. Today we open a road to hope," he said after voting, adding that he was confident of victory.
"Today we open a road to a better tomorrow, with our people united, dignified and proud. In a Greece of social justice and prosperity, an equal member of a Europe that is changing. A Europe of the peoples and of solidarity."
Joint currency or the drachma
The young left-wing leader has accused his rivals of attempting to terrorize the population by casting him as the man who will ruin the country, and insists he will keep Greece within the euro — something that repeated opinion polls have shown about 80 percent of Greeks want.
Greece has been dependent on the rescue loans since May 2010, after sky-high borrowing rates left it locked out of the international markets following years of profligate spending and falsifying financial data.
The spending cuts made in return have left the country mired in a fifth year of recession, with unemployment spiraling to above 22 percent and tens of thousands of businesses shutting down.
For his part, Samaras has cast Sunday's choice as one between the euro and returning to the country's old currency, the drachma. Although he voted against Greece's first bailout in 2010, when his party was in opposition, he backed the second bailout agreed on late last year.
He has vowed to renegotiate some of the terms of the accompanying austerity, but insists the top priority is for the country to remain in Europe's joint currency.
"The main thing we will decide on is the dilemma, euro or drachma," he said during his final pre-election rally in central Athens on Friday.
European leaders warn Greece
European leaders have cautioned that Greece could be left outside the 17-nation eurozone if it pulls out of its bailout commitments.
Newly elected French President Francois Hollande warned in a Greek television interview earlier this week that "if the impression is given that the Greeks want to move away from the commitments that were taken and abandon all prospects of revival, then there will be countries in the Eurozone that will want to end the presence of Greece in the eurozone."
Nearly 10 million people are eligible to vote in the country of about 11 million people. Polls close at 7pm (1600 GMT), with official results expected a few hours later.
"Today the Greek people speak. Tomorrow a new era for Greece begins," Samaras said after casting his ballot in a small town in southern Greece, the first of the main politicians to do so.
As Greeks went to the polls, more than 250 firefighters and soldiers battled a fire raging south of the Greek capital since Saturday afternoon. Local authorities said several houses were burned. Gale-force winds were hampering the efforts to extinguish the blaze, and Greece asked for help in water-dropping planes from Italy, France and Croatia.
Three firefighters suffered burns on Saturday, while four people were arrested for allegedly starting the fire by accident during welding work at a construction site.
Egyptian presidential vote enters second day - CBC
Egyptians were choosing on Sunday between a conservative Islamist and Hosni Mubarak's ex-prime minister in the second day of a presidential runoff that has been overshadowed by questions on whether the ruling military will transfer power to civilian authority by July 1 as promised.
Going head-to-head in the runoff are Ahmed Shafiq, a longtime friend and self-confessed admirer of Mubarak, and Mohammed Morsi, the candidate of the fundamentalist Muslim Brotherhood.
The two-day balloting, which ends Sunday evening, followed a week of political drama in which the military slapped de facto martial law on the country and judges appointed by Mubarak before his ouster dissolved the freely elected, Islamist-dominated parliament.
The generals who took over from Mubarak 16 months ago are expected this week to spell out the powers of the new president and appoint a 100-member panel to draft a new constitution, moves that will further tighten the military's grip on the nation.
The race between Shafiq and Morsi has deeply divided the country, 16 months after a stunning uprising by millions forced the authoritarian Mubarak to step down after 29 years in office.
"I am bitter and I am filled with regret that I have to choose between two people I hate. I have to pick a bad candidate only to avoid the worse of the two," lamented a silver-haired pensioner in Cairo's crowded Bab el-Shariyah district. He refused to give his name, fearing retribution for speaking so openly.
"Nothing is going to be resolved and Egypt will not see stability," he added.
A similarly pessimistic note was echoed by another voter, accountant Yasser Gad, 45. "The country is heading to a disaster. It will keep boiling until it explodes. No one in the country wants the former regime to rule us again."
Voting fatigue
Few voters displayed an air of celebration visible in previous post-Mubarak elections. The prevailing mood was one of deep anxiety over the future — tinged with bitterness that their "revolution" had stalled, fears that no matter who wins, street protests will erupt again, or deep suspicion that the political system was being manipulated. Moreover, there was a sense of voting fatigue.
Egyptians have gone to the polls multiple times since Mubarak's fall on Feb. 11, 2011 — a referendum early last year, then three months of multi-round parliamentary elections that began in November, and the first round of presidential elections last month.
"It's a farce. I crossed out the names of the two candidates on my ballot paper and wrote 'the revolution continues'," said architect Ahmed Saad el-Deen, in Cairo's Sayedah Zeinab district, a middle-class area that is home to the shrine of a revered Muslim saint.
"I can't vote for the one who killed my brother or the second one who danced on his dead body," he said, alluding to Shafiq's alleged role in the killing of protesters during last year's uprising and claims by revolutionaries that Morsi's Brotherhood rode the uprising to realize its own political goals.
Motivated by fear
Others said they were voting against a candidate as much as for one. Anti-Shafiq voters said they wanted to stop a figure they fear will perpetuate Mubarak's regime; anti-Morsi voters feared he would hand the country over to Brotherhood domination to turn it into an Islamic state.
With the fear of a new authoritarianism, some said they picked the candidate they believed would be easiest to eventually force out of power.
Asmaa Fadil, a young woman who wears the Muslim veil, said she lost confidence in the political process, particularly after the dissolution of parliament.
"I don't trust the whole thing. I feel everything is planned in advance and what we are doing now is just part of the plan," she said as she waited in line to vote in Sayedah Zeinab.
The election is supposed to be the last stop in a turbulent transition overseen by the military generals. But even if they nominally hand over some powers to the winner, they will still hold the upper hand over the next president.
The generals are likely to issue an interim constitution defining the president's authority while they retain their hold on legislative powers, and they will likely appoint a panel to write the permanent constitution.
Denmark V Germany : UEFA Euro 2012 Match Preview - Football
Published: 17 Jun 2012 - 12:22:09
High-flying Germans out to down Danes
A confident Germany are aiming to beat Denmark on Sunday in Lviv to finish top of Group B and set up a quarter-final near their base in Gdansk.
Having already flown to the Ukrainian cities of Lviv and Kharkiv for their respective wins against Portugal and Holland, Germany return to Lviv aiming to beat the Danes and book their place in the Gdansk quarter-final on June 22 against the Group A runner-up.
The Germans are not yet guaranteed a place in the knock-out phase and still need at least a point to be sure with the Group B runner-up facing a last eight clash in Warsaw on June 21 against the winner of Group A.
With three goals at Euro 2012, including two against Holland and the winning header against Portugal, Bayern Munich striker Mario Gomez has finally converted his impressive club form to German colours.
After an injury-hit season, Bayern midfielder Bastian Schweinsteiger shook off the calf strain he suffered in the Champions League final to set up both Gomez's goals against the Dutch with pin-point passes.
Following their shock win over Holland and 3-2 defeat to Portugal, victory against Germany should put Denmark in the quarter-finals, but even a draw would be enough if the Netherlands beat Portugal in the other group match in Kharkiv.
No easy ride for Denmark
But Schweinsteiger and Germany have other ideas.
"We can approach the final game against Denmark with a lot of self-confidence - every victory gives you an extra push," said the 27-year-old.
"We definitely want to win that game against Denmark."
Germany coach Joachim Loew said his side have their destiny in their own hands after two wins in the "Group of Death".
"With this victory (against Holland) I think we've opened the door to the quarter-finals. It's now in our hands to make everything clear on Sunday," he said.
Germany will be without suspended right-back Jerome Boateng, who picked up his second yellow card against Holland, and Loew has hinted he may switch captain Philipp Lahm from the left or even play a three-man defence.
Danish wing Dennis Rommedahl will miss the game against Germany while midfielder Niki Zimling is a doubt after the pair suffered muscle injures in the defeat to Portugal.
Danish striker Nicklas Bendtner - who scored both their goals against the Portuguese - said his team have to show plenty of belief against the Germans.
"It's nice to know that we still stand a chance in this tournament," he said.
"We will have to do everything we can to get a good result against Germany. We are still in it.
"If we win against Germany, we are through. If we draw, other things must go our way. If we lose, we are out."
ryj/pi
Denmark V Germany - view commentary, squad, and statictics of the game live.









0 Responses to "Dunne down about Irish slump - Football"
Post a Comment